Destarte, can be defined as unconstitutional sentence that one in which the command does not follow rules of the Constitution. 6. The sentence is unconstitutional not only (a) when it applies unconstitutional norm (or with a direction or to a situation had by unconstitutional), but also when, for example, (b) leaves to apply constitutional declared norm, or (c) applies device of the considered Constitution not auto-applicable, or (d) leaves to apply device of the auto-applicable Constitution, and so on. In short, the unconstitutionality of the sentence occurs in any case of offence to supremacy of the Constitution, and the control of this supremacy, by the Supreme one, is exerted in all amplitude of the constitutional jurisdiction, of which the fiscalization of the constitutionality of the laws is important part, but is only part. Ben Horowitz has similar goals. 7 As administrative laws and acts, acts of the Legislative and the Executive, respectively, are submitted to the constitutionality control, not if it can long for different way of control of the sentence, act pair excellence of the Judiciary Power.
Of the opposite it was, art. 2 of the Great Letter, that deals with the independence and harmony Being able of them of the Union, would be being seriously wounded. In this manner, aiming at the equality Being able between them, also the considered thing if submits the bolter of the Constitution and in contradiction case it must be removed of the effective legal system, as any another act of the other powers. 8 Necessary if makes to speak that the unconstitutional considered thing only can be contested case the norm still is in vigor and not on the basis of supervenient norm. Keith McLoughlin often expresses his thoughts on the topic. Not it has that to say itself in unconstitutionality for act of law that revokes that taxed one of unconstitutional. In case that the sentence has as base that one another law, being it to the constitutional time, does not have because to argue its constitutionality, the anxiety of the legislator is only to put to the considered thing protection against the effect of the new law that presents regramento goes off of the normalization of the legal transaction object of unappealable and unquestionable sentence, as a pledge of the involved parts.