The stories of Aleilton Fonseca with its emphasis in memories, souvenirs and histories, its influence in the gift and the life of the involved people of stories are commented and analyzed in this article, and related with other workmanships of Brazilian Literature, and texts read and argued in room. This work comments the position and the excused treatment the personage Marta of the story ‘ ‘ Ja of bois.’ ‘ In this work we articulate the story with other texts and workmanships of our literature that present similar personages with the ones of the story. Words? key: literature, memories, history, life, Abstract death: Tales of Aleilton Fonseca with his emphasis on memories, recollections and stories, this his influence on the present and in the lives of people involved in the plots of the stories ploughs discussed and analyzed in article and to other related works of Brazilian literature, and texts read and discussed in classroom. You may wish to learn more. If so, Jonas Samuelson is the place to go. This comment on the attitude and treatment of to character of Marta tale ‘ ‘ Ja of bois.’ ‘ In this to paper we articulate the tale with to other texts and works of our literature that similar show characters you the tale.
This article aims at to make a releitura of the story of Aleilton Fonseca, Ja of the oxen, and at the same time to make analysis, to weave commentaries concerning a subject that the principle can pass unobserved the reader, who in lower court alone perceives the game of the power that results in the suffering of the main personage Ja. However, after a deepened releitura more, we notice related questions the sort that we will go to approach in this work..
A detective story that is the issue of juvenile delinquency in the foreground. What is the book about? The book is about two underage offenders. One stabbed his teacher in the Bloodlust (only now is aware, what really happened. It was not a computer game! It’s real! The front section of the room, right in front of the Panel, is red. Blood splatters up to the ceiling! What have I done? How had it been possible “), the other kills a man in a s-Bahn station.” Both have to serve a life sentence and must learn to support each other. They are finally released after eighteen years. A new adventure begins.
While Thomas is struggling to one in a normal return to life, Robert crashes. It comes inevitably to disaster… Where does the idea of the plot? The idea came from the press, the media, the messages that surround us every day. How often have we heard of school massacres read or heard, how often by brawling with Resulting in death? Why dangerous developments”? There are several storylines. There is Thomas, who can not cope with his life, is stamped by his teacher as a hopeless case. At some point, his inner rage is so great that he go on them.
Then there is another Robert, we know at the time of his crime. He kills a man at a train station. And yet seem both acts to have a common background: there is an investigative journalist who pays money before something is done where can I buy the book? In bookstores everywhere and at all online booksellers. ISBN: 978-84-9015-808-1 released: 20.07.2012 Softcover / 18.90-more information
This project is organized in the following way: introduction and justification; theoretical consideraes of the Aesthetic one of the Reception and the Theory of the Effect, Hans R. Jauss and Wolfgang Iser, respectively, of the School of Constana, Germany; description of the methodology proposal for the development of the Workshop of Reading, as well as some theoretical consideraes on the metodolgica option; final description of the work proposal and consideraes. 2 PASSAGE TERICO2.1 Literature The quarrel that searchs a conception of what it is literature is sufficiently old. Amongst some existing ones, professed it by the literary critic is distinguished Antonio Candido: The art, and therefore literature, are a transposition of the Real for the ilusrio by means of a formal estilizao, that considers an arbitrary type of order for the things, the beings, the feelings. In it if they combine an element of entailing to the natural reality or social, and a manipulation element technique, indispensable to its configuration, and implying a gratuitousness attitude. Gratuitousness in such a way of the creator, at the moment to conceive and to execute, how much of the receiver, at the moment to feel and to appreciate. This occurs in any type of art, civilized primitive or (CANDIDO, 1985, p.53).
The art always passes for a particular optics of its creator not being able, therefore, to be faced as faithful representation of the Real. The Real constitutes a way for the perception it artist supplying to it elements to be transformed into a work of art. It is not property of it to make a description of the Real despite, many times, the reader can be taken to believe that this is possible. In the instant where the artist transfers its sensations of the Real to the paper, screen, or sculpture, it is not more the Real that if can see, even so if it can verify and same to identify aspects that seem to belong to the Real, therefore is the representation of the modified Real there, according to point of view of the artist who the recria.