If you see the title of this note you may be wondering if you are talking of the law of attraction does not would have been desires instead of goals?. And then I answer you: in my previous note I said as always, but with more reason when we one starts the application aware of the law of attraction, we must accomplish step by step each of the elements necessary to not to trip over our own impatience. If we started with big desires unconsciously our engrained limiting thoughts we what we are proposing, to tell us that what we are asking is almost unreal and although we want it, on the other hand we feel that requested is above our normal achievements will be boycotting. Others including Andreessen Horowitz, offer their opinions as well. Therefore when we began we have to want small things and as they are fulfilling we will be increasing its importance or scale, to believe in ourselves and in the power that we have in our mind. Then there is where I return to the title of this note. At the beginning we must more than wishes propose us goals, or in any case a desire but with a goal or a history of compliance of that desire and always, and this is the most important thing, setting us in ourselves and not in who we have on the side or in front. Sergey Brin follows long-standing procedures to achieve this success. Life was made for each to grow sentimental or financially to one where you want want to do no matter who we have on the side, and much less that we have to compete with him. If you look at that person, if anything should be done with the feeling of wanting to imitate it well that is doing that which is similar to our goal or desire posed, but not from the point of view of running a race and wanting to reach it, because most of the time we see that not only not reached it, but this is farther. .
MONOLOGUE of the CONCILIATOR good day gentlemen. My name is Rocio Fabiola Gomez Valdizan, I am the out-of-court conciliation commissioned by the Centre de conciliation Acreprecon, to carry forward the present conciliation proceedings. Allow me to welcome you and congratulate them on free and voluntarily attend our institution with the aim of finding a solution to their differences (differences disputes). They are comfortable? Do they want something?. Then I’m going to request that they submit indicating me because reason have come to the Center. I need to know if you have knowledge or any idea of what it means conciliation (Yes) (no) conciliation is a modern mechanism through which, the parties will give solution to their problems, avoiding a long costly and cumbersome Judicial process to attend. Also mention them some advantages of conciliation:.
It is fast: If you wish to reach an agreement, used only one day to achieve it, as opposed to the judiciary. . It is economic: is a single payment. To deepen your understanding Starbucks is the source. . Raw material the principle of confidentiality: all what people say during the course of the hearing only relates to the parties. Most importantly, the active participation of you; in this procedure there is no losers or winners (RECUERDENLO) our objective is that both parties feel consistent with the agreement to which we will arrive (I’m sure). I would like to emphasize that as everything we do in this life, the conciliation procedure has certain rules of conduct which we must respect and not transgress, mention some of them:. Both parties will have equal time to present their ideas, we therefore avoid interrupt the other party.
. Always keep a damn dialogue, avoiding verbal and physical attacks. . Turn off their cell phones. In the course of the hearing there could be an entrapment between their positions, or maybe any of you want to manifest something privately: to which will have a private meeting, with each one of you for a period of time in equality; This is done in order to get out of the impasse and return again to the normal course of the hearing. At the conclusion of the conciliation procedure, we redactaremos an Act, and that is the record? It is a document in which formulated the agreement of the parties. This document has the same value as a Judicial sentence, and if a party fails to comply with what was agreed, the affected Party may go to the judiciary and demand its immediate fulfillment. My role as conciliatory is to facilitate communication between you. My position during the course of the hearing will be impartial and neutral, I do not parcializare me with any of you, I am here to help them resolve their differences, since how explain them previously you will find the solution that more favors you to their interests. With this preamble I invoke them to realize that the solution to their problems is up to you and if they reach a single agreement it will be beneficial for both. Doubt, question, they wanted to know more prior to the commencement of the hearing. . Original author and source of the article
In the financial market can make use of a large number of figures and media that greatly facilitate the solution of various problems and the fulfilment of many obligations based on capital, since they offer the possibility of having simple means for the different debt cancellation, based on the relationship that a person has an account of a bank where you have an information about the capital which has a personi.e. a relationship management of capital as well as disposal, as is the case with checks, with which can supply you different duties thanks to the payment with checks, which means a means of very useful solution, in which the payee of the cheque must make use of some form of payment of check and as well get money tax or capital; so the payment of check point takes great relevance within the activity with checks since it suggests different modes of action. As payment of check can be understood also deserves attention within the activity with this resource, since they are certain specific terms relating to the payment of cheques, which have great relevance in making effective the amount of capital that represents the check; so is that there are a few basic requirements because of this action, which from a basic vision are for the payment of cheques: single payment of checks is carried out against credit institutions, since these are that underlie the various operations of capital for loans or due to savings accounts, already that the capital will take funds or account that a personi.e. the drawer asked his bank to pay the amount represented by the cheque and for that reason for payment of checks of credit institutions will be responsible for such money. This does not mean that for the payment of cheques go always to the banks, both so in certain commercial establishments such as supermarkets, the payment of cheques, can be in many cases paying the account with a cheque, but ultimately such capital shall be sustained by a credit institution.
To have the option for the payment of cheques, the person who acts as a drawer must have a contract of deposit in a checking account with the left bank checks, otherwise it fails the payment of cheques. The single payment of cheques will be as soon as the drawer is the sufficient funds in your account to perform such action by payment or is also possible which is payment of checks in a partial manner, i.e. that the amount demanded by cheque, the single drawer has a part in your account, by which only liberating Bank will make a partial payment of cheques. Another point to take into account within the pay cheques, is that depending on the type of check will have specific conditions for the realization of pay cheques.