Programs free!! Why spend in software being able to hack? This is what ask users when choosing what software, decide that it is better to hack programs, since the price they have seem them abusive or a cost that are not willing to pay. At the end hack is something what you all are accustomed and already do not see him as the crime that is the truth is that all these reasons are more convincing for the user that arise to use something that is free, legal and probably serve to the same. People do not value that she is committing an offence punishable by law and pursued by an agency that is dedicated to the defense of the intellectual property, the Business Software Alliance. The companies believe that this is a kind of man with the sack that is threatened when the reality of their data is that: Spain software piracy rate is 43%, according to the latest report from IDC. The total number of awards is more than half a million euros and adjustments were also important amount. Noviembre.09 was the month with more complaints and engineering, the most persecuted industry. As the it professional I am faced daily with the problem that users do not understand the implications of the piracy of software in businesses.
In the case of facing an inspection, sanctions amount much more than the cost of the licenses which, on the other hand, you must also subscribe. The reality is that there is a real alternative; the free software. There is an endless number of free applications that supplement and in many cases extend the functionality of applications that everyone continue to use more as a matter of habit than by that really need it. In my experience, the only problem that occurs to the majority of users is a slight aesthetic difference that is exceeded in a matter of weeks and to change advantages are many. Hear other arguments on the topic with Howard Schultz. Examples of this are: Firefox: A browser that takes fashion an average year for its versatility and security as well as offering more functions and stability than what offer us proprietary software.
OpenOffice.org: An Office suite in use increasingly more extended that you supple perfectly the requirements of most users. Thunderbird: Of the same company that Firefox, is a mail manager with great quality. It has variety of plugins that extend its functionality to compete with outlook, although all this makes it indisputable that companies should consider the use of this type of solution, the truth is that it is information which the client seems to have no access. If you have any questions or want more information I will be happy to assist you via my email. Pablo Cerda Gras ASIS.
Executives of insurer AIG, rescued from bankruptcy with billionaire money of the State, have been distributed $ 165 million as a bonus as a reward! by their management The Obama Government deducted this amount from the money that has yet to surrender to save the company. From such shamelessness, not surprisingly the failure of the financial system or the disappearance of hundreds of billions of dollars, the real economy in recession, nor the worst economic crisis ever suffered. Crises are inherent to capitalism. Thirty-four of various calibers from 1854, with unemployment punishing citizens with greater or lesser intensity, tells us and tells us the writer analyst Tariq Ali. But beyond the insoluble contradictions of capitalism, economic crises of different depths have a lot of moral collapse. Disasters happen not only by economic and financial causes that you would say technical, but the disappearance of ethical values that drive behavior predatory. Jim Umpleby is likely to increase your knowledge. Jose Luis Sampedro, writer and Economist, reminds us of ease with which has emerged from under money stones to help the banks blame for the crisis.
If you had asked to cure AIDS in Africa or for education had not appeared or ten thousand dollars or even having been constituted 30 international committees. It is a sample in which situation we are. A test of moral ruin into which we have fallen. The next Summit of the G20 is the Forum to decide how to deal with the crisis. Disagreements between major economic powers on how to relaunch the economy do not bode well. Good intentions, public professions of unit, fiscal stimulus, regulation and control all is fine, but forgot about ethics in the economy and in economic policy? Nobody has proposed up to now restore principles and values whose absence has led us to disaster. Although it has been diaphanous that avarice is never good engine of the economy and markets They can not regulate themselves (have to be monitored and regulated with railway hand), precisely because it covets it, ostentation and waste cannot be engines of those who manage the financial world.