I presume the innocence of Baltasar Garzon, like that of any other accused not convicted by the courts. The only thing that disturbs me the probable offences of trespass is that always there is usually an Alfredo Perez, the whiskers, willing to give away a suit or a watch to see if he gets any gabela in compensation. For this reason, I suspect also, who financed generous courses and conferences like the Garzon. Doctoral programs were neither free honoris causa received years ago by the then banker Mario Conde, who stopped to get them after entering prison, although not cease to therefore be less ready than the previous day. And it is that we are accustomed to that favors, cronyism and collusion are our bread every day, try a savings box which condones the debt of a related political party, which renews the unpaid loan by a counselor as Diaz Ferran, or who finances ruinous works imposed by the regional President.
Does not lack that favors Unnamable materializes in the Act. The mere fact occur comes to be a kind of warning or reminder: today for you; tomorrow for me. That, even if the receiving of favor is more honest than a Virgin and never go to pay with the same currency. It is what happens with Jose Bono, whose declaration of goods is of a pristine transparency. Now well: it received 700,000 euros by a non-written memoir is something that does not happen them, nor together Perez Reverte, Juan Marse and Antonio Gala. That such fact cannot occur without anyone blush is therefore gives a correct image of the moral parameters in which we operate.